Search for: "Old Chief v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 1,769
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2011, 12:05 pm by Nolan and Auerbach
However, the implications of this court decision, United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:32 am by Justin Riemer
Justin Riemer is Chief Counsel of the Republican National Committee, which filed an amicus brief in support of the state in Rucho v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:27 am by Rick Hills
The most appropriate limit on Congress' enumerated powers was stated 193 years ago by Chief Justice John Marshall in McCulloch v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:38 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
United States, which relied on an earlier First Circuit decision (United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:21 am by Josh Blackman
Two months ago, the Supreme Court decided a similar case, South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 12:07 pm
  A panel of the Ninth Circuit in Miranda B. adopted a particular standard on this issue by quoting from a purported en banc opinion written by Chief Judge Kozinski, with a citation to "United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 4:08 am
His petition says that he "is the only person in the United States who is on death row for a non-homicide offense. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm by Marty Lederman
  As Derek Muller has explained, that practice appears to have begun in 1968, when California and New York refused to include the name of the 33-year-old Eldridge Cleaver to appear on their ballots for President (see Cleaver v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 11:38 am by Kristin E. Hickman
United States and his concurring opinion in NFIB v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm
 The petitioner pointed out that the United States is different and that it would be difficult to define "technology based" in the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The petitioner pointed out that the United States is different and that it would be difficult to define "technology based" in the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 7:00 pm by Jon Katz
Whenever the United States Supreme Court issues an opinion stating or creating expanded rights to criminal defendants, those already convicted who might benefit from the opinion, wonder whether the rule will have retroactive or retrospective effect, or only prospective effect. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 10:18 am by Orin Kerr
Relying on the concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]