Search for: "Oral Folks" Results 201 - 220 of 819
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2014, 3:08 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Supreme Court Justices convene today for the first oral argument of this term. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:12 am
The folks at the "Drug and Device Law" blog were only off by one vote in their prediction posted yesterday. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 11:01 am by oliver
In what follows, the Board made clear that the way in which the patent proprietors wanted the proceedings to be conducted was unacceptable:[2.1] R 115(2) EPC and A 15(3) RPBA provide respectively that, if a party duly summoned to oral proceedings (OPs) before the EPO does not appear, the proceedings may continue without that party and that the Board shall not be obliged to delay any step in the proceedings, including its decision, by reason only of the absence at the OPs of any party duly… [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 2:47 am by Ken Lammers
However, establish a presumption against oral argument. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 5:14 am by Heather Douglas
Is there a good reason to only produce written reasons or oral decisions from the bench? [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 11:13 am by Jeff Gamso
 He's probably best known for his studies of which of the folks on the Supreme Court generate the most laughs with their comments and questions during oral argument. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 11:28 am by Paul M. Secunda
This morning, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Heimeshoff v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
The oral argument transcript is here, and a good recap of the issues on SCOTUSBlog is here. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 11:09 am by Kenneth Anderson
(Kenneth Anderson) Co-Conspirator Jonathan offers a possible explanation for why legal elites, particularly the legal academy and the  elite legal academy, got the Obamacare oral arguments so wrong. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 8:57 pm
  The comment laments the circuit courts' guideline-centric approach to reasonableness review since Booker (which is termed "Booker minimalism"), and provide another nice and valuable read as folks rev up for next week's oral arguments in Claiborne and Rita. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 7:10 am
Do we need confirmation that the earth revolves around the sun, or that Justice Thomas is the least-active questioner at SCOTUS oral argument? [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 8:58 am
The Court decided 68 cases after oral argument this term, and Justice Kennedy dissented only twice, according to end-of-term statistics compiled by the folks at SCOTUSBlog. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 7:36 am
I know that for many folks in these difficult times the answer is going to be -- where do I sign. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 1:17 pm by Adam Levitin
  I'm sure my proposal will be some skepticism (to say it lightly), whether because folks think this is a barely closeted Court-packing scheme (but why bother with this when there's a much simpler way to pack the Court), or because they somehow think that there's something sacred or efficient about 9 Justices (clearly those folks have never been to a SCOTUS oral argument, but I suspect those are also the same folks with the naive idea that… [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:39 pm by Andrew Weber
The audio recording and transcript of the oral arguments are available. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 1:59 pm by Kent Scheidegger
He is particularly critical of the emphasis on oral argument. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:15 am by Lisa McElroy
I would be remiss if I failed to mention the highlight of the week on the oral argument front:  United States v. [read post]