Search for: "Owings v. Respondent" Results 201 - 220 of 2,298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2022, 4:05 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This extinguished almost the whole of a larger debt which the respondent owed to AWA. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
I-2, empower the respondent Minister to facilitate the admission to Canada of a person where the Minister is satisfied, owing to humanitarian and compassionate considerations, that admission should be facilitated or an exemption from the regulations made under the Act should be granted. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Kyle Hulehan
Responding to potential negative economic effects of the surtax by repealing or adjusting the rate would require another constitutional amendment, which would take years to accomplish. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by INFORRM
However, the present position in law is already in effect (owing to the impact of Strasbourg jurisprudence) that the court would not make such an order or finding unless there were exceptional and compelling reasons why it was in the public interest for the disclosure to be made: see Mersey Care NHS Trust v Ackroyd [2008] EMLR 1 (CA) at [17]. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 11:01 am by Mark Ashton
Wife responded that the alimony was “reimbursement” alimony as contemplated by Zullo v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
So too, the LGBTQ rights movement sought the freedom to marry under the banner of marriage equality--a point that Justice Kennedy's discussion in Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 10:26 am by The Murray Law Firm
  As reported by FirstCoastNews.com, “[v]ideo from a ring camera shows police arriving to the scene at [Apartments] on Orchid Street. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:48 am by Peter Mahler
First, in response to plaintiffs’ argument that their status as the only other members of the LLC obviated the requirement that a claim of misappropriation of funds owed to the LLC be brought derivatively, the court answered simply that “[a]ny injury is to [the LLC], and any damages must be recovered by [the LLC],” citing as authority the Court of Appeals’ 1989 opinion in Glenn v Hoteltron Systems, Inc. [read post]