Search for: "Oxley, in Re" Results 201 - 220 of 475
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2017, 4:30 am by Donna Ballman
Some of you have already seen my article in Vox, Why It's So Hard To Say No To Your Boss - Even If You're The Directof of the FBI. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 7:21 am by John Jascob
The report states that in accordance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the board will publish all quality control criticisms that the firms have not remediated to the PCAOB’s satisfaction within the required time period.Strengthening enforcement. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:43 am by qbaron
” Professors Levmore and Robertson, played by Maggie Wells, ’24, audition for the keynote presentation, singing that they’re bringing econ back. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:34 am by Broc Romanek
Whistleblower Laws in Court On May 3rd, as noted in this memo, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals held that the whistleblower law in Section 806 of Sarbanes-Oxley do not protect leaks to the media in Tides v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 4:48 pm
But by trying to take the computer apart, Russell tampered with evidence and violated the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, prosecutors said. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 12:44 pm
See Roberta Romano, The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Making of Quack Corporate Governance, 114 YALE L.J. 1521, 1559 (2005). ... [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:27 pm by Ted Allen
  In an editorial, Bloomberg News warned that the House bill would “gut many of the investor protections established just a decade ago in the 2002 Sarbanes Oxley law. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 10:08 am
" Corporate audit committees: "They're less qualified than the inadequately trained auditors. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 12:26 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKTorts Reconsideration of Dismissal of Negligence Claims Against Bank Denied; Res Ipsa Loquitor Inapplicable Jones v. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 7:09 pm
  We're now at the same scale as ALEA, in far less time. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 2:01 am
Our Starbucks venti-sized cup is about to runneth over so we're going to use a little of what's sloshing over the sides ($150 million, to be exact) to start a charitable foundation. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 12:44 pm by Ted Frank
So not only do we not have the three or five Larry Ribsteins we needed, we now don't even have the one, and we're poorer for it. [read post]
23 May 2013, 4:23 am by Broc Romanek
This provision was required to be adopted by Congress in Section 306 of Sarbanes-Oxley to address the issue that employees of Enron had when they couldn't sell company securities because of a change in employee benefit plan administrators and Enron's share price was dropping significantly. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 5:11 am by Larry Ribstein
Filed under: sarbanes-oxley, securities litigation, securities regulation [read post]
31 May 2010, 10:38 am by NL
It also deals specifically with joint interests, where Oxley didn't. [read post]
31 May 2010, 10:38 am by NL
It also deals specifically with joint interests, where Oxley didn't. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:54 pm by Business Law Post
These scandals ultimately led to the adoption in 2002 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and that is when the new era of corporate governance has begun. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:57 pm by John Steele
 We're glad to announce that Richard Painter has joined us at Legal Ethics Forum. [read post]