Search for: "Oxley v. Oxley" Results 201 - 220 of 1,106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2015, 12:54 pm by Walter Olson
Ilya Shapiro comments [link fixed now] on the Supreme Court’s ruling this morning in Yates v. [read post]
11 Jan 2006, 10:09 pm
The First Circuit held this week that the civil whistleblower protection provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (18 U.S.C. 1514A) does not have extraterritorial application.Carnero, an Argentinian citizen residing in Brazil, worked for two Boston Scientific Corporation subsidiaries. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 8:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Section 21F(c)(2) sets forth other persons not eligible to receive awards.75 Section 21F(h)(1)(C).76 Section 21F(h)(1)(B)(iii).77 Section 934 of the Act, adding § 15(u) to the 1934 Act.78 Section 935 of the Act, adding § 15(v) to the 1934 Act.79 Section 922(c)(2) of the Act, adding 18 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 9:11 am by John Jascob
At other times, the Court has expanded Sarbanes-Oxley (extending its whistleblower protections to employees of contractors in Lawson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:31 am by John Elwood
(John Elwood) I have long thought that if the Court invalidated any provision of Sarbanes-Oxley in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:00 am by Jason M. Knott
Marcus Argument Recap: Five Takeaways from Lawson v. [read post]