Search for: "Oxley v. Oxley" Results 201 - 220 of 1,107
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2018, 6:27 am by Joy Waltemath
The court noted that this argument is at the root of a circuit split and the subject of a case before the Supreme Court (Somers v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The world of directors’ and officers’ liability is always dynamic, but 2017 was a particularly eventful year in the D&O liability arena. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 6:13 am
Wang (Harvard Business School), on Wednesday, December 13, 2017 Tags: Airgas v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 7:03 am by Joy Waltemath
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act protects whistleblowers from retaliation for reporting conduct which they reasonably believe violates certain federal laws, including mail fraud and wire fraud. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 10:09 am by Jonathan Marx
In the October 2017 term, the Supreme Court will take up its first criminal tax case in almost a decade, Marinello v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 10:09 am by Jonathan Marx
In the October 2017 term, the Supreme Court will take up its first criminal tax case in almost a decade, Marinello v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 2:20 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Every year just after Labor Day, I take a step back and survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and D&O insurance. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:35 am by John Jascob
The group recommended the Supreme Court’s definition of materiality outlined in TSC Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:09 am by John Jascob
By Joanne Cursinella, J.D.A CPA who was terminated from Grant Thornton, LLP, allegedly for reporting fraudulent activity, could not sustain her whistleblower protection claim because working for a public company, without more, is insufficient to trigger Dodd-Frank whistleblower protections (Reyher v. [read post]
As reported in our previous Alert on March 29, 2017, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals widened the circuit split on this question in Somers v. [read post]