Search for: "P Plaintiff" Results 201 - 220 of 13,724
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2017, 4:19 am by R. David Donoghue
P. 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction over plaintiff’s third amended complaint. [read post]
13 May 2009, 9:50 pm
The '122 patent, which is owned by Plaintiff-Appellee Procter & Gamble Co. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 10:15 am
Law Week, December 18, 2007 (76 USLW 1356, 2007):A plaintiff in a negligence suit against two airlines is entitled to a new trial because a magistrate judge granted judgment as a matter of law before the plaintiff's case was "fully heard," the U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 10:24 am by The Docket Navigator
The court granted defendants' motion for monetary sanctions for plaintiff's persistent discovery failures, but denied plaintiff's request for a terminating sanction. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 6:11 pm
The district court granted summary judgment to defendants, and plaintiffs appeal. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 6:32 pm by Andrew Frisch
Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion, the court reasoned: “As a starting point, “[p]arties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense-including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition, and location of any documents …” Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(1). [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 12:54 pm by Julie Lam
  Then, on October 31, 2008, plaintiff filed a Notice of Intent with the Court of Claims, signed by plaintiff and plaintiff’s counsel. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 1:38 pm by Gregory J. Brodzik
Stark overruled plaintiff’s first and second objections, and affirmed Magistrate Judge Mary P. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 7:56 am by Eugene Volokh
{See David Lat, As the Yale Law School World Turns, Original Jurisdiction (Dec. 3, 2021), https://davidlat.substack.com/p/as-the-yale-law-school-world-turns ("Happy Friday. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:32 am by Eugene Volokh
In denying a request to proceed anonymously based, in part, on vexatious litigation, another court summarized the relevant concern: [P]laintiff has engaged in [a] campaign to conceal his litigation history across the country. [read post]