Search for: "P Plaintiff" Results 201 - 220 of 13,725
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am by Marty Lederman
  The Anderson Plaintiffs, for example, represent (Br. at 12) that the Colorado Supreme Court held that “states have constitutional power to enforce Section 3 through ballot access laws” and (p. 52) that the Colorado Election Code “allows voters to sue for enforcement of federal constitutional qualifications at the ballot-access stage. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Cunningham and Carlos Juarez, Mayer Brown LLP, on Friday, January 26, 2024 Tags: Director, Executive Compensation, Retainers, Vesting Non-GAAP Adjustments: Impact of Merger and Acquisition Activity on Performance Targets and Results Posted by Mike Kesner and Steve Pakela, Pay Governance, on Saturday, January 27, 2024 Tags: Acquisition, GAAP, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, incentive plan payouts, Incentives, M&A, Merger, non-GAAP, Proxy advisory Books and Records Demands 2023… [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Cunningham and Carlos Juarez, Mayer Brown LLP, on Friday, January 26, 2024 Tags: Director, Executive Compensation, Retainers, Vesting Non-GAAP Adjustments: Impact of Merger and Acquisition Activity on Performance Targets and Results Posted by Mike Kesner and Steve Pakela, Pay Governance, on Saturday, January 27, 2024 Tags: Acquisition, GAAP, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, incentive plan payouts, Incentives, M&A, Merger, non-GAAP, Proxy advisory Books and Records Demands 2023… [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 9:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Plaintiff showed (1) and there was enough to go to a jury on (2). [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:21 am by Jon Brodkin
The post-trial ruling found in favor of lead plaintiff and shareholder Richard Tornetta, concluding "that the compensation plan is subject to review under the entire fairness standard, the defendants bore the burden of proving that the compensation plan was fair, and they failed to meet their burden. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 11:26 pm by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
First the Paris first instance court, then the Paris Appeal Court sided with the plaintiff, but limited the infringement to points (b) and (d) of said provision.The main issue that the Paris Appeal Court had to address was the extent to which Art. 13(1) applies to products that are not covered by a GI. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm by Daphne Keller
The Supreme Court is about to review a constitutional challenge to two unprecedented and very complicated laws regulating social media. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:07 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
City and County of San Francisco (1st—A165231) Workers’ Compensation Exclusive Remedy Rule—Public Employers—Court of Appeal, affirming trial court’s judgment of dismissal in favor of defendants, held that plaintiff firefighter employed by San Francisco Fire Department (SFFD) was barred by workers’ compensation exclusive remedy rule in Labor Code §§ 3600(a), 3601(a) and 3602(a) from pursuing personal injury claim against… Yalung v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Its website states: “Our core services include right-of-way acquisition, surveying, permitting, project planning, and E&P land rights management. [read post]