Search for: "P. v. Germany"
Results 201 - 220
of 574
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2015, 7:48 pm
Germany of 6 September 1978, Malone v. the United Kingdom from August 2, 1984, etc.).58. interpretative value of the preamble is deeply rooted in countries with common law system ( common law ), Preamble to the Constitution embodying a guiding framework for constitutional interpretation.59. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 2:09 pm
France and Huvig v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 2:09 pm
France and Huvig v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 2:09 pm
France and Huvig v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 2:09 pm
France and Huvig v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 2:56 pm
Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, § 1, eff. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
1. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:18 am
Vierrath explained how the system in Germany worked, something that appeared far more complex than anyone presumed. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 5:10 am
Press Announcement from the Court of Justice of the European Union Judgment in Case C-673/17, Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände ̶ Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV v Planet49 GmbH Storing cookies requires internet users’ active consent, a pre-ticked checkbox is therefore insufficient. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 12:00 pm
Quite soon the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) will give its judgment on a preliminary reference from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) in Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:54 am
The Strasbourg Court has ruled in Öztürk v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 12:35 pm
FOCUS published the mobile phone rankings as of June 23, 2012, and it is easy to see why Apple has been suing Samsung and HTC in the USA to keep the better phones of those competitors off American retail shelves and out of consumers' hands so that buyers are forced to settle for lower-ranked Apple products, thinking they have no better alternatives -- which are in fact available elsewhere throughout the world: Samsung Galaxy S III HTC One X Samsung Galaxy Note HTC One S LG P940 Prada 3 Apple… [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:04 am
In the Optis v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:36 am
VOORHOOF and P. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 5:31 am
This UK roundup adds the final chapter in the IPKat's 4-part series of round-ups from the Netherlands, Germany and France earlier this year. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In Wilkes v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Vajda, Judges,Advocate General: P. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:40 am
Versa v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
A comparative reprise", guest Kat Alberto Bellan discussed reactions to the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-530/12 P OHIM v National Lottery Commission, [explained in his earlier Katpost here] in which that court set aside a decision of the General Court that had effectively allowed the cancellation of National Lottery's Community trade mark on the basis of evidence which was plainly fake but which… [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
The trial decision was recorded on this weblog under the title "Taking the p*** -- or merely retaining it? [read post]
