Search for: "PETERS v. US " Results 201 - 220 of 5,485
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm by centerforartlaw
It said, ‘galleries may not use artist’s sale proceeds for the gallery’s operations,’ but it did not say what would happen if they did. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:40 pm by Rik Lambers (Brinkhof)
Nebido is used to treat long-term testosterone deficiency in men. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Internal emails also suggested Near was facilitating a “massive illegal data dump” involving EU data going to US government entities. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Nearly a decade later, in Hill v Church of Scientology, the Court clarified that this residual relevance obliges courts to engage in principled balancing, weighing Charter values against “the principles which underlie the common law,” and using those values as “guidelines for any modification to the common law which the court feels is necessary” (Hill, para 97). [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 8:38 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Email Us: If you prefer written communication, you can email us at peter@l-a.law to share the specifics of your situation. [read post]
Peters noted that over half of AI tools used by the federal government are purchased from commercial vendors and that the U.S. government should be careful in its procurement and use of these tools. [read post]