Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 201 - 220
of 4,537
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2023, 8:53 am
The strength of any available defence rests on the evidence against you and the precise details of the allegations. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:51 am
Those cases: United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
The Court then wrapped up: "Before us, no party challenges these conclusions. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 6:37 pm
That brings us to Havens Realty v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 2:28 pm
The Second Circuit in Chai v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 2:28 pm
The Second Circuit in Chai v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
A US Federal Court in Manhattan dismissed the claim following trial in April 2023. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:58 am
" Defendant argues that Ashcroft v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
Does the fact that a defendant was involved in political activity using campaign funds affect the analysis? [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 11:31 am
While it is a close case, the Court concludes that under the pleading standards set forth in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 1:53 pm
This is Part V in EFF’s ongoing series about the proposed UN Cybercrime Convention. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 11:12 am
Stein, 347 U.S. 201 (1954) and Goldstein v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:57 pm
The case is Hamilton et al. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 11:00 am
On August 18, 2023, the Fifth Circuit sitting en banc in Hamilton v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
For instance, Luis Moreno Ocampo, the former ICC Prosecutor, has critiqued the idea of a Ukraine-specific tribunal, which “promotes nothing short of selective justice,” while Christine van den Wyngaert, a former ICC judge, questions “whether the remedy [of a special tribunal] is worse than the disease [of aggression]” writing: Unlike the [ICTY], which had the support of the entire international community when it was set up, it is to be expected that support for the Putin… [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 1:12 pm
In Ward v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:56 am
As amicus in support of the petitioner, the U.S. government has asked to participate in oral argument, using part of the petitioner’s allotted time (Murray v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 1:36 pm
The court’s June 2023 decision in Groff v. [read post]
