Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 6,157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2016, 8:14 am
Foto: Recinto de Río Piedras de la UPR (Facebook) Descarga el documento: Conlan V. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 2:14 am
United States Coram nobis es un remedio extraordinario para desestimar una convicción. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:10 am
As Lord Carnwath concluded after his illuminating discussion of the standard required of planning reasons (at paras 35-42), the question will be “whether the information so provided by the authority leaves room for ‘genuine doubt … as to what (it) has decided and why’” (at para 42, citing Sir Thomas Bingham MR in Clarke Homes Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment (1993) 66 P & CR 263). [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am
Id. at ¶71.[1] This state of affairs ended in 1994, when Congress enacted the MMPA Amendments of 1994, Pub. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 2:49 am
Thus, instances of intervention by the Member States in the field of direct taxation, even if they concern issues that have not been harmonised in the European Union, are not excluded from the scope of the rules on State aid control».2)ID., para. 105. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:09 am
The second issue was the interpretation of ‘insurmountable obstacles’ in Appendix FM, para EX.1(b). [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:18 am
Not for Publication United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 5:19 am
Nor did Janowiec v Russia (2013) App nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09 assist the claimant. [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:58 am
” (para 77)“I accept that what Mr Turner was describing was obvious,…” (para 85)To state what in itself should now be obvious, Virgin won, and Rovi’s patent was held invalid for lack of inventive step over the first piece of prior art. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:30 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 3:57 am
The recent CJEU judgment in VKI v Amazon (C-191/15) concerns jurisdiction both in the context of conflict of laws (applicable consumer laws) and the Data Protection Directive. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 8:09 am
This week, the UK Supreme Court refused permission to appeal in the matter of Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union v Wightman and others. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 11:30 am
Vea Batson v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:28 am
In brief, the case of R v Egan [1992] 4 All ER 470 had stated (without the court having heard full argument) that the previous case of R v Lloyd [1967] 1 QB 175 legitimised two approaches to defining ‘substantial’ in the context of diminished responsibility. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 1:00 pm
4) ISPs should bear implementation costs ... and may think of preventative filtering as a cheaper solutionSimilarly to what stated in his earlier judgment in 20C Fox v BT (No 2), Arnold J took the view that "the rightholders should pay the costs of an unopposed application ... [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 1:09 pm
Nuestro Tribunal Supremo en Umpierre v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 2:32 pm
En otras palabras, el Tratado de París, a pesar de que representó un gran logro al unir los principales países emisores de gases de efecto invernadero, dejó abierta la puerta para que estos adoptaran las medidas que ellos mejor entendieran necesarias para lograr los objetivos de reducir sus respectivas emisiones. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 2:29 am
Descarga el documento: United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 1:01 pm
v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:40 am
Masri v Consolidated Contractors International Co SAL and another (No 2) [2011] EWCA Civ 21; [2011] WLR (D) 11 “Save in exceptional circumstances, para 4.2 of the Practice Direction supporting CPR Pt 32 required the deponent of an affidavit to identify the source of the relevant information or belief stated in the affidavit. [read post]
