Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 6,160
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
The legal system of the United States has its roots in the laws of England. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 4:26 pm
Switzerland, para 113). [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 1:00 am
# # #USDOJ PRESS RELEASE ~ 09.29.23USA v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 11:13 am
For example, in Unico Mechanical Corporation, the GAO sustained the protest where the agency unreasonably assessed a weakness (1) notwithstanding the proposal met the solicitation’s stated minimum requirement, and (2) for a mistaken finding that the offeror did not address a feature in its proposal. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 10:30 pm
More specifically the Court stated that ‘the EDPS merely examined whether it was possible to re-identify the authors of the comments from the SRB’s perspective and not from Deloitte’s’ (para 103). [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 6:07 am
Co., 2018 CO 44, ¶ 17, 418 P.3d 1173, 1178 (2018). 3 See Gargano v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 10:28 am
Air & Liquid Systems Corp., 2017 IL App (4th) 170173, ¶ 65. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 7:07 am
(Policy Position, supra, ¶ 5). [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 6:48 am
The case is Nazario v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:44 am
Hille, 180 So. 3d 634, 652 (¶60) (Miss. 20 [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 9:31 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 5:55 am
” Schroeder v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:06 pm
" (Ibid., ¶ 22; also ¶ 35). [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 12:44 pm
¶ 5–7 & Exs. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Rule 3.5 clearly states that one should never create a neutral citation when an official one is unavailable. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:00 pm
Sus dos hits fueron "Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States" (1833) y el "Commentaries on the Conflict of Laws (1834)" que siempre cita Vélez en las notas al Código.COMPLETANDO EL TOP 5Digresión aquí para decir que de aquí para abajo no podemos hablar de influencers en la Corte. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Nearly a decade later, in Hill v Church of Scientology, the Court clarified that this residual relevance obliges courts to engage in principled balancing, weighing Charter values against “the principles which underlie the common law,” and using those values as “guidelines for any modification to the common law which the court feels is necessary” (Hill, para 97). [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 9:15 am
” Grako v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 5:55 am
Security Council S/RES/2467 (2019) para. 16). [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am
”[12] Importantly, there is no presumption of cost reasonableness.[13] If an initial review of the facts results in the Government challenging a specific cost, the contractor has the burden to prove that the cost is reasonable.[14] The FAR provides that whether a cost is reasonable depends on a “variety of considerations and circumstances,” including the following: Whether it is the type of cost generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the conduct of the… [read post]
