Search for: "Parker v. State of Washington"
Results 201 - 220
of 237
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(Washington University)Levy David M. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Australian Review of National Innovation System released: (IPRoo), (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), (creativecommons.org), (IP Menu News), Senate Committee on the Judiciary approval of Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act 2008 and surrounding debate (Law360), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (Wired), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica),… [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In Wilkes v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 12:44 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 5:54 am
But to Washington State Trooper Brent Hanger, it was the smell of . . . arrest.Via Arbitrary & Capricious, and later the WSJ Law Blog (stealing Skelly's Cheech & Chong theme without any attribution at all), the Supreme Court of Washington did something that I haven't seen in quite a while in State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 2:05 pm
U.S., 07-776), and it refused to hear an appeal by five Washington, D.C., residents who had wanted to take part in the challenge to the city’s ban on handgun possession (Parker, et al., v. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 5:29 pm
The Sunday Indy Star column, Behind Closed Doors, has this item today on tomorrows oral arguments in the case of State of Indiana v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
(One managing partner recounted being faced with a near insurrection among half a dozen partners when he had the temerity to relocate their Washington, DC office by all of one short city block. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:19 pm
App. 4 Cir.2001); State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Parker, No. 05-5191 Denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a capital case is affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) invalid waiver of petitioner's right to counsel; 2) ineffective assistance of trial counsel; 3) Brady violations; 4) a failure to grant petitioner a separate trial from his co-defendant; 5) a due process violation due to admission of hair-matching evidence; 6) ineffective assistance of appellate counsel; 7) denial of a state-court forum in which… [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 7:42 am
U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 31, 2008 State of NC v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 4:45 pm
"Shelly Parker et al, v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:07 am
The case, Parker, et al., v. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 2:28 am
I haven't read the complete record of trial in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 11:32 am
The city of Washington's appeal (District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:46 am
"He disagreed with the appeals court ruling last March in the Parker v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:02 am
The city of Washington’s appeal (District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:29 pm
Parker, 348 U.S. 26 (1954), in which the Court held that eminent domain in the redevelopment context would be reviewed as social legislation, and Hawaii Hous. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
APFEL KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OFJENNER & BLOCK LLP PUBLIC ADVOCACY601 13th Street N.W. 100 Fair Oaks Lane, Ste. 301 Washington, DC 20005 Frankfort, KY 40601(202) 639-6000 (502) 564-3948 November 5, 2007 *Counsel of Record I. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 3:05 pm
At the same time, the Court will consider a cross-appeal, Parker v. [read post]
