Search for: "Parks v. United States et al" Results 201 - 220 of 408
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2011, 8:07 am by Andrew Spillane
 Taking the per se position on vertical territorial restraints was United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 10:31 pm by Giesela Ruehl
There is no better example of this interaction than the Shape v Supreme litigation ongoing before Dutch courts, with the most recent decision in this dispute rendered in December 2019 in Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (“SHAPE”) et al v Supreme Site Service GmbH et al (Supreme), COURT OF APPEAL OF ‘s-HERTOGENBOSCH, Case No. 200/216/570/01, Ruling of 10 December 2019 (the ‘CoA Decision’). [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am by Wolfgang Demino
 LUCINDA VINE; KRISTY POND, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.PLS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED; PLS LOAN STORE OF TEXAS, INCORPORATED, Defendants-Appellants.No. 16-50847.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.Filed May 19, 2017.Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, USDC No. 3:16-CV-31.Before: BARKSDALE, GRAVES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.PER CURIAM.[*]Appellants PLS Financial Services, Inc., and PLS Loan Store of… [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
This case concerns a consolidated appeal by Sensations, Inc. et al. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 6:00 am by Maxwell Kennerly
United States et al., Civil Action 02-2010, United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:45 pm by WIMS
The case followed another related decision in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 11:44 am
For publication opinions today (8): Larry Keesling, et al. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Customs and Border Protection] need not demonstrate that the [Chinese and Cypriot] articles are restricted; rather, the [CPIA] statute 'expressly places the burden on importers to prove that they are importable.'"The case of United States v. [read post]