Search for: "Part 60 Put-Back Litigation"
Results 201 - 220
of 612
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2024, 6:30 am
Smith and King might respond that the difference today is that the right actively seeks to protect those putative white victims. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:18 am
We know all about this as lawyers; it’s part of the drill, especially in the major litigation that we get called upon to defend. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 5:20 pm
FMC did not put its own money into those "investments" (and did not advance it prior to the transaction closing date). [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:58 am
But here's the strange part. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 4:14 am
In part the Circuit Court held that the fact Wal-Mart's damages may amount to billions of dollars was "principally a function of Wal-Mart's size, and the predominance test turns on the primary goal of the litigation - not the theoretical or possible size of the damage award," id., at 16235 (italics in original), and that the prayer for back pay does not defeat Rule 23(b)(2) certification because backpay is "an equitable, make-whole remedy in… [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:57 am
back to Mexico – instead of detaining them or releasing them into the U.S. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
In that case, the Ninth Court of Appeals in Beaumont likewise affirmed the summary judgment for the bank notwithstanding the presence of a controverting affidavit, but it reversed the award of attorney’s fees and remanded that portion of the case back to the trial court. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 3:06 pm
I spent much of my first decade teaching a lot like my professors taught me in the 1980s, and as their professors taught them in the 1950s and ‘60s, and so forth, all the way back to Langdell. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 6:05 am
This, too, results in a lack of clarity to put it mildly. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 11:29 pm
Here's a back of the envelope calculation to put this into perspective. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:32 pm
Mike Peterson and I work so hard and have been so crazy-busy that if I don't put the invitation out in this article for people to give feedback and encourage me to finish, because I/we tend to get lost in our office's day-to-day crises, we will have trouble completing this so important re-circle back onto this topic. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:25 pm
The agents then put the computer aside. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 4:00 am
Applying for an order under Rule 4.1 would in practice be a means of putting that issue before the court. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
WMG proposed a two-part compromise to artists with record deals that pre-date 2002. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:54 pm
There are vast legal ‘deserts’ where too many litigants are forced to confront an unfamiliar legal system without a lawyer. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
We discussed this in one of our earliest posts, “Federal Courts Should Remember Federalism,” back in 2006. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 9:35 am
(See the new guidance on ex parte communications at Rule 5.1-2C of the FLSC’s Model Code of Conduct.) [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm
Welcome back to the UK Human Rights Roundup, your weekly bulletin of human rights news. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 2:07 pm
A default hearing was scheduled after many months of back and forth between the parties and delays or non-appearances on the part of the ex-husband. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 2:07 pm
A default hearing was scheduled after many months of back and forth between the parties and delays or non-appearances on the part of the ex-husband. [read post]
