Search for: "Paul (I) King" Results 201 - 220 of 1,173
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2007, 2:10 pm
At $130K: Alston & Bird; Arnall Golden Gregory; King & Spalding; Kilpatrick Stockton; McKenna Long & Aldridge; Morris, Manning & Martin; Paul Hastings; Powell Goldstein; Smith Gambrell & Russell; Sutherland Asbill & Brennan; Troutman Sanders; Womble Carlyle.At $135K: Jones DayAt $145K.: Dow Lohnes; Hunton & Williams; McGuireWoods; Schiff Hardin.At $160K: Fish & Richardson (IP work). [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 3:27 pm
Per sports journalist and blogger, Paul Oberjuerge, Hammond's not being hired to do PR work. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 7:26 am
 As Paul Clement wrote when he resigned from King & Spalding: Defending unpopular positions is what lawyers do. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:01 am by Jeff Gamso
" asks Polonius of Hamlet who accurately but mockingly repliesWords, words, words.The thing is, Hamlet is mocking both himself and Polonius.The prince has been charged by the ghost of his father, old King Hamlet, to kill his uncle Claudius, brother of the old king, successor king himself, and stepfather to the prince having married the old king's wife. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 6:07 am by Gritsforbreakfast
As originally conceived, habeas corpus was a function of the unfettered divine right of kings, and thus the King's Court, to bestow mercy on their subjects. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:41 pm by James R. Copland
Yesterday, the Manhattan Institute's City Journal published an online piece I'd written shortly after word leaked Sunday night that President Obama was set to announce Elena Kagan as his choice to succeed John Paul Stevens on the U.S. [read post]
13 May 2018, 6:36 am by INFORRM
In terms of politics and story selection, Desmond – who I vividly remember regularly chomping on fat cigars over early page proofs in the Express’s non-smoking Ludgate House HQ – was obviously king. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  “Probably I do not need to repeat,” Pound declared in an open letter to his successor as chair of the ABA committee, “but out of abundance of caution, I am saying once more as emphatically as I know how that my statement that I was not the author of the bar association bill did not mean, and in my judgment cannot be taken to mean, that I am out of accord with the Committee or the Association on the subject. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:16 am by Randy Barnett
But one consistently applied rule is particularly germane: The offspring of the King were natural born subjects of the King regardless of where they were born, whether on English territory or not. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:49 am by Isabel McArdle
Paul Chambers v DPP [2012] EWHC 2157 - Read judgment The famous ‘Twitter joke’ conviction of Paul Chambers has been overturned on appeal, bringing welcome clarity to what is and what is not an offence of this type. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:28 pm by Justin Walsh
The kings maintained that the king could do no wrong and therefore the king was immune for responsibility for his actions. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:40 am
 Paul Volker has urged such a policy, as have others. [read post]