Search for: "Paul J. Clark" Results 201 - 220 of 421
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2012, 9:07 am by INFORRM
  A split of this kind is highly unusual – the most recent example that we are aware of is the case of Sheldrake v DPP [2003] EWHC 273 (Admin) in October 2002 where Latham LJ and McCombe J were unable to agree and directed a hearing before a three judge court which took place 4 months later before Clarke LJ and Henriques and Jack JJ who reached a 2:1 decision (which was itself subsequently overturned by the House of Lords). [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:13 am by New Books Script
K 3316 T44 2005 The theory and practice of legislation : essays in legisprudence edited by Luc J. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
He did not work for NME and was never discarded by the IPC as a possible editor for the magazine.” Jeremy Clarke-Williams, Russell Jones Walker, acted for the claimant. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am by INFORRM
On the same day Tugendhat J heard an application for permission to amend in the case of Modi v Clarke. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by INFORRM
Journalist Lauren Collins interviewed editor Paul Dacre (“he still doesn’t have a computer in his office“) and Mail Online editor Martin Clarke. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:30 am by Kevin
Most of the choices make sense, like Mark Twain, Harry S Truman, Generals John J. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
On Wednesday 7 March 2012 the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council will hand down judgment in the following: Dylan Simon v Manuel Paul Helmot, Sans Souci Limited v VRL Services Limited and [J & O Operations Limited and another]; Eloise Mulligan and Grace Wong v The Kingston & Saint Andrew Corporation. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
Paul Gibbons (@foimanUK) explained the campaign here. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Sharpe considers that section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 “was used completely inappropriately to prosecute [Paul] Chambers“. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Statements in Open Court and Apologies News Group Newspapers apologised to Paul Gascoigne for a story in the Sun in July 2010 that wrongly alleged that he groped a shop assistant.”The allegation was published in good faith but it was nevertheless false,” Gascgoine’s counsel Richard Pitkethly told the High Court. “Mr Gascoigne did not grope the shop assistant as alleged in the article, or at all, and the defendant now accepts this.” Ben Beabey, solicitor for… [read post]