Search for: "Payne v. Payne"
Results 201 - 220
of 665
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2016, 1:20 pm
Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 10:00 am
In Mobile Equity Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 1:27 pm
” Payne v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:37 am
Jewell (Indian Land Title - Non-Recognized Tribe) Shields v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:56 am
Helmerich & Payne International, a case involving pleading standards for expropriation cases against foreign governments filed in U.S. courts. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:50 pm
This morning the court issued a 5-4 opinion in Janus v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 9:21 am
This week Natasha and I discuss various topical family law matters, including delays in the family courts, draft guidance to the forthcoming Private Law Practice Direction, possible review of Payne v Payne and Baroness Deech's proposal that grandparents be remunerated for the free childcare that they provide. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 4:33 am
Yesterday the court heard oral argument in Venezuela v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 6:30 am
Schoenthal v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Payne; Marilyn A. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:20 am
Adverse references to FMLA leave usage sufficient to defeat employer's claim that it terminated employee for performance deficienciesGoelzer v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 7:17 am
Microsoft Corporation, 2-13-cv-01015 (TXED May 11, 2017, Order) (Payne, MJ) [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:09 am
T-Mobile USA Inc., 2-08-cv-00441 (TXED March 5, 2015, Order) (Payne, M.J.) [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 7:32 am
Hughes Network Systems LLC et al, 2-15-cv-00037 (TXED June 20, 2017, Order) (Payne, MJ) [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:18 pm
In Payne, the Court reversed the decision of the Michigan Supreme Court, which had applied North Carolina v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
Again, Payne v Cooper is cited in support. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:52 am
” The Maryland Federal District Court also held in Payne v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 9:49 am
U.S. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 11:01 am
Allen Payne. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 10:29 pm
Z (A child) [2012] EWHC 139 (Fam) is, to my knowledge, the first reported relocation case since MK v CK [2011] EWCA Civ 793.To briefly recap, in MK v CK it was made clear that the only principle to be drawn from Payne v Payne [2001] 1 FLR 1052 - which had skewed relocation decisions for ten years - was the paramountcy principle - everything else was guidance.Returning to Z (A child) :The facts: This case comes with a lot of 'baggage', primarily… [read post]
