Search for: "Pena v State"
Results 201 - 220
of 374
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2015, 3:01 am
Todo comenzó con el caso SC09-332 – State of Florida v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:20 am
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm
Under the standard set forth by the US Supreme Court in Adarand Constructors Inc v Pena (65 EPD ¶43,366 (1995)), to survive constitutional review, a government entity’s consideration of race has to meet strict scrutiny standards; thus, it must: (1) serve a compelling state interest; and (2) be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 7:17 am
Descarga el documento: United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 8:44 pm
The law took effect in 2013.In Pena v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 6:28 am
Los resultados muestran que la brecha racial en las sentencias se ha ampliado desde que se emitió la sentencia de United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 11:28 am
The high PBE counties are generally above the state average on Green vote and mostly well above. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 1:51 pm
Citing the Supreme Court’s 1985 precedent of Heckler v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 3:52 pm
(United State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:21 pm
Pena (1995), where she harshly criticized Korematsu. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 8:15 am
Pena (1995), which is harshly critical of Korematsu. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 9:16 am
The case is Parker v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:50 pm
State Office of Risk Management v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
United States v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm
When the Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:42 pm
In Pena v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 7:04 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 7:54 am
The style of the case is, Pena v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 7:20 am
However, the appeals court affirmed summary judgment in favor of the county on the employee’s age discrimination and workers’ compensation claims (Pena v County of Starr, December 18, 2013, Martinez, R). [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:58 am
Pena, 2012 BCSC 1884, and Thomas v. [read post]
