Search for: "Pennsylvania v. Cost" Results 201 - 220 of 1,830
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2015, 10:30 pm by Elizabeth A. Bokermann, Esquire
 Therefore, in some situations the courts are allowed to deviate from the guidelines in order to account for those unique issues.The recent non-precedential (in other words, not binding on future courts) Pennsylvania case of Sallustio v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 5:51 am
”As noted in the post, a Pennsylvania case arrived at a different conclusion, Scott v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   After reviewing the legal precedent on this issue from both the federal and state courts of Pennsylvania, including the recent cases of Smith v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   After reviewing the legal precedent on this issue from both the federal and state courts of Pennsylvania, including the recent cases of Smith v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 1:02 pm by William A. Ruskin
District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania held that the prevailing defendants at trial  may recover a whopping $367,000 in e-discovery costs because such costs are the modern-day equivalent of duplication costs. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 10:44 am
The reason why unreasonable contest counsel fees are rarely found these days is reflected in a recent decision by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, Grady v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
Oliviera] “Disability rates among working-age adults are shaped by race, place, and education” [Martha Ross and Nicole Bateman, Brookings] Tags: agriculture and farming, arbitration, California, Elizabeth Warren, Nebraska, occupational licensure, Pennsylvania, wage and hour suits Labor and employment roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 10:30 pm by Elizabeth A. Bokermann, Esquire
However, it most cases, litigants cannot afford this type of valuation.Recently, in Morgan v. [read post]