Search for: "Pennsylvania v. Williams" Results 201 - 220 of 1,054
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2020, 8:20 am by Lawrence Lessig, Jason Harrow
The legal theory that would allow state legislatures to go rogue and appoint electors without regard for the popular vote rests on an argument made by Chief Justice William Rehnquist in Bush v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
But the Court itself issued no ruling.More than a century later, the Court entered the fray in Bush v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Justice Kavanaugh has since voted to reject review of the Pennsylvania postmark case, so perhaps with the benefit of a bit more time he has reconsidered things, but three of his colleagues continue to push the Bush v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:39 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
First, on Tuesday morning, a motion for Justice Barrett's recusal was filed in Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
Austin Sarat is Associate Provost, Associate Dean of the Faculty and William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 12:25 pm by Scott R. Anderson
Chief Justice William Rehnquist articulated this view in his concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:54 am by Ravi S. Nagi
Virgin Islands who was a plaintiff in a similar lawsuit, Segovia v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:15 am by Matt Cooper
Pennsylvania In Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
 Relying, in part, on the case of Williams v. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 12:59 pm by Matt Cooper
Pennsylvania In Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 8:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
Brechner First Amendment Project, the Pennsylvania Center for the First Amendment, and I filed an amicus brief in support (many thanks to our pro bono counsel, William Brock Most). [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm by Amy Howe
” The Baders were Jewish, and Ginsburg recalled, as a child, seeing a sign in front of a Pennsylvania resort that said “No dogs or Jews allowed. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Regardless, the court noted that the regular use exclusion had been previously upheld by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s holding in the case of Williams v. [read post]