Search for: "People v. Henderson" Results 201 - 220 of 396
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2014, 8:51 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Supreme Court: McCutcheon v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 6:48 pm by Dan Harris
The article was written by William Henderson, a professor at the Indiana University Maurer School of Law and one of the most knowledgeable people alive on the legal profession. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm by Marty Lederman
Circuit granted an injunction pending appeal by a 2-1 vote (Judges Henderson and Brown, with Judge Tatel dissenting) in the consolidated Priests for Life and Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Washington cases; and the U.S. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 6:46 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
 Chief Judge Merrick Garland brings up the case of Johnson v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:09 am by Susan Brenner
Henderson, 955 So.2d 1193 (Florida Court of Appeals 2007). . . . [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 11:13 pm by Jeff Gamso
   Mitchell v City of Henderson et al Complaint by dmataconis h/t Randazza and Ilya Somin at Volokh [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 4:01 pm
  Estes gave Henry and a man named Foote a ride from Henderson, Nevada to Arizona. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm by NL
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm by NL
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 11:11 pm by Sam Murrant
Now, the bloggers’ responses to the report: ObiterJ has posted a very informative initial reaction, which covers Lord Justice Leveson’s main points upon the publication of his report – a free press is a vital safeguard in a democracy (and as such, the government should not be involved in press regulation), there was no evidence of widespread corruption at the top level of police/media relations (though politicians did get too close to media elements), and Ministers were the right… [read post]