Search for: "People v Butts"
Results 201 - 220
of 363
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2015, 6:41 am
Plaintiff further testified that he felt like he was walking on egg shells at work because he feared being disciplined for things that other people were not disciplined for, and that despite being a victim when a white employee lifted his leg up behind Plaintiff's head and when another employee patted his butt, Plaintiff was still disciplined. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 8:16 pm
App. 2003); Gorman v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:37 am
Much as the First Circuit held in Glik v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 10:52 am
” Jack explained how the Supreme Court’s decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:57 pm
Is it somewhat of a pain in the butt if someone actually files an absurd "lien" against you with the Secretary of State? [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 4:37 am
, that she had a `big butt’ and he would date her if she were older. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 3:10 am
App. 2003); Gorman v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
” In Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 9:53 am
Underground Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 7:51 am
While two of the coworkers said nothing further, the third made one additional comment telling him “his black butt should have stayed fired. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 4:08 am
That makes some people angry. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:42 pm
Don't get me wrong - I'm all about putting people up to no good in jail but, well, take, for instance, the case of People v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 3:06 pm
According to the Census Bureau, there are fewer than 100 people with the last name of Travolta in the entire United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 2:01 pm
You can read that case, Fulgham v. [read post]
11 May 2014, 4:29 am
State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:52 pm
Samsung case in California), slide-to-unlock (at issue in the ongoing Apple v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 6:01 pm
People say the darnedest things at work. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 8:28 am
Turning to detainee news: Wells reported the much awaited DC panel decision in the Guantanamo force-feeding case, Aamer v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
It seems that the complete duplication may be “excessive”, in light of the quantity, quality and importance of the material used (Blanch v Koons).Bruno is unimpressed with the dumb Starbucks crownhe has to wear to make his significant human happyIn relation to market effects, would the hundreds of people queuing up for Dumb Starbucks have alternately visited the original coffee retailer that day? [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 5:46 am
Huff . . . eventually admitted, `I'm certain I have [pocket dialed people]. . . [read post]
