Search for: "People v David Daniels" Results 201 - 220 of 415
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2011, 12:31 am by INFORRM
  Its director Stephen Abell said that the organisation has never been more active or proactive, has high satisfaction rates from the people that use its services and is helping more people than ever before. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Matthew Waxman
The combined cases—referred to collectively as Arver v. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 3:53 pm
Sullivan; andTaking a Closer Look at Prosecutorial Misconduct: The Ninth Circuit's Materiality Analysis in Hayes v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:26 am by Graeme Hall
Case-law commentaries from across the blogosphere: Duncombe (No. 2) [2011] UKSC 36 Education Law Blog Quader, R (on the application of) v SSHD Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants R (NM) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] The Small Places blog Home Office v Tariq Daniel Barnett’s Employment Law Archive Thamby, R (on the application of) v SSHD – LTTE, nationality, naturalisation and “good character” United Kingdom… [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 3:48 am by SHG
There is bad law, terrible law, like Graham v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm by Daniel Isenberg
” Attitude to Human Rights A number of people have been talking and thinking this week about human rights more broadly, and our attitude towards them. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Guest Author
Interestingly, it is this last work—counselling “firm rule over people”—which grounds the insurgent common good constitutionalism, the New Right’s substantive legal theory. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 9:39 pm by Florian Mueller
., due to market share, purchasing power, and other factors.)The Ninth Circuit is working on its Epic Games v. [read post]
It alleges serious misconduct: plotting to pay hush money to multiple people to avoid electoral consequences and falsifying documents to cover it up. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
And finally … David Banks’ blog has a discussion of the reporting restrictions which are likely to affect the reporting of latest plot twist in the Archers. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:52 am by William Ford
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The trial tested a rarely used criminal statute meant to ensure that people comply with congressional subpoenas. [read post]