Search for: "People v Donald"
Results 201 - 220
of 2,349
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
These beliefs in turn fuel two pernicious ideas: (1) that one can dramatically decrease government spending without undercutting performance by cracking down on waste, fraud, and abuse; and (2) that people who were successful in business (like Mike Bloomberg) or even people who pretend they were successful in business (like Donald Trump) are, for that reason, qualified to run the government. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:24 pm
”That, however, is news that people should hear. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Judge Trevor McFadden said he was “disturbed” that Federico Klein considered it part of his “duties” to attend the rally that day and join the protesters at the Capitol agitating for lawmakers to throw the election to Donald Trump. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am
Roe was a terrible corruption of America’s constitutional jurisprudence.The Guardian also reported this from a different hearing: "Roe v Wade did constitutional cover to the elective killing of unborn children in America, period. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
But in Palmore v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm
But in Lindke v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 5:53 am
Garnier and Lindke v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
They were dressed as Donald Trump and Stormy Daniels. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 9:51 am
Garnier and Lindke v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
They were dressed as Donald Trump and Stormy Daniels. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:40 am
In the first, Matal v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 8:27 am
The second case, Lindke v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
SeeEisner v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:30 am
I note how the recorded votes in Missouri v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
This action obviously mirrored former President Donald Trump’s declaration of a national emergency in order to build a border wall. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 7:02 am
"Bragg’s press release in People v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
Former US President, Donald Trump, claims that the “Steele Dossier” produced by the defendant breached his data protection rights. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 3:51 am
Moreover, the courts have rejected the use of exclusion in Powell v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm
" The case, Jarkesy v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Do you believe that 74 million people will accept that? [read post]