Search for: "People v Harry Williams"
Results 201 - 220
of 506
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2017, 7:24 am
The purpose of imposing this 3-cents-an-ounce sugar-sweetened beverage tax is to allow people to get their kids educated and move them out of poverty into taxpaying citizens.[4] Consistent with this revenue-centric approach, diet beverages were included in the tax to try to maximize its revenue potential, despite not contributing to caloric intake. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
United States and Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:15 am
And in 1926, Supreme Court Chief Justice William Howard Taft said in Myers v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 2:07 pm
Professor Volokh is concerned about an unusual development in Brummer v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
The problem is, just two years ago, in Walker v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:21 pm
The Blot: In December 2014, Brummer participated in an NAC decision that upheld the permanent ban on two stockbrokers, Talman Harris and William Scholander, from associating with any FINRA-regulated firm. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:44 am
As I explain in my book at greater length, Chief Justice Salmon Chase dissented from the Supreme Court’s decision in Bradwell v Illinois (1873), which upheld the discrimination against women in licensing lawyers. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:48 am
Nor was Brennan, although he was both able and influential, as indeed was Stevens—until he wrote a ridiculous opinion in Clinton v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
In the space below, I provide a brief summary of the United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 12:31 pm
’” This term’s death-penalty opinions suggest that Breyer is intent on assuming the mantle of former Justices William Brennan and Harry Blackmun. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:18 am
In Locke v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court observed in the context of high school students in Tinker v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear two years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 3:50 pm
Harris, Robert D. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:00 am
For that group of people, whatever their reasons, I cannot and will not try to persuade them otherwise. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court two decades ago in Clinton v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
The Defendants are led by William Whatcott. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
In Wallace v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 1:18 pm
Douglas, William Brennan, Potter Stewart, Thurgood Marshall, Harry Blackmun, and Lewis Powell. [read post]
