Search for: "People v Johnson" Results 201 - 220 of 2,755
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In reviewing the charge for legal sufficiency, “each case is fact specific” (Johnson, 95 NY2d at 373) and the allegations must be analyzed in the context of “the whole incident” (Hogle, 18 Misc 3d at 871, citing People v Tichenor, 89 NY2d 769, 776 [1997]). [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 11:43 am
Johnson, No. 05-1444, remands based on a petition for rehearing, which was held in abeyance based on the SCOTUS's decision in Rapanos v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:09 am by Suzanne A. Luban
§ 924(c), applying the reasoning of two prior High Court cases on this topic, Johnson v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
And as if that wasn't enough, many of the people in gover [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 7:24 am
The court of appeals reasoned that, just as the city could not punish someone for their status – being homeless – it also could not punish them for conduct 'that is an unavoidable consequence of being homeless.'"Writes Amy Howe, at SCOTUSblog.Here's the 9th Circuit opinion: Johnson v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 5:09 pm by Levin Papantonio
The women claimed the company’s talc-based baby powder caused their ovarian cancer when they used it as a part of their daily feminine hygiene routine.In 2020, Johnson & Johnson agreed to pay more than $100 million to resolve more than 1,000 lawsuits blaming its baby powder for causing cancer.About Chris TisiChristopher V. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:29 am
Talc litigation is undoubtedly on the rise, as more and more people are becoming aware of the serious possible health implications of its use. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 7:01 pm by James Romoser
His legal team argued for years that Johnson was ineligible for the death penalty under Atkins v. [read post]