Search for: "People v March" Results 201 - 220 of 7,738
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2022, 1:32 am by Rebecca C. Morgan Stetson Law
On March 3, 2022, DOJ announced "that Colorado unnecessarily segregates people with physical disabilities in nursing facilities, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Supreme Court’s decision in Olmstead v. [read post]
4 May 2008, 4:05 pm
Last week, the New York Court of Appeals handed down its decision in People v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 2:23 pm
To see the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department decisions (including index) released on March 4, 2008, click on the links below: Index to 03-04-08 Slip Opinions 03-04-08 Slip Opinions People v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:40 am by Ron Coleman
Here’s a roundup of what other people are saying about the decision in Network Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 1:24 pm
To see the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department decisions (including index) released on March 27, 2008, click on the links below" Index of Slip Opinions 02-27-08 Opinions Announced on 03-27-08 People v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 2:23 pm
This is why you take seriously a person's threats -- at a workplace or anywhere else -- to go on a killing spree. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 3:09 pm
Don't read the first six pages of this case if you have little kids. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 11:17 am
This is the type of work you can do when -- as a court -- you've got a little extra time on your hands. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 11:30 am
I said last week that I might not have dismissed the indictment -- and let a (potentially) guilty person free -- based on the government misconduct in that case. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:03 pm
It's a California Supreme Court death penalty opinion. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Under the rubric of special needs, the Court has approved of such practices as suspicionless visual strip searches of people entering the general population of a detention facility, in Florence v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 1:01 am
Supreme Court remand, California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District holds that the admission of the victim's statement violated the Confrontation Clause and the error was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, requiring reversal of the judgment and a remand to the trial court, in People v. [read post]