Search for: "People v Mitch"
Results 201 - 220
of 259
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Texas, Collens v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
Ever since Roe v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:30 am
CNN reports that, following up on numerous calls by GOP lawmakers for investigations in the wake of Flynn’s resignation, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said it’s “highly likely” the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence will investigate Flynn’s discussions with Kislyak. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Maple Drive Farms v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 9:58 pm
All this radically differs from the all-powerful image that many people have of Senator McConnell. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 6:54 am
Google Epic Games, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
” Viacom v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Some of them are, both metaphorically and, increasingly literally, old friends, but thanks especially to Richard, I am also meeting some new people and, I hope, making brand-new friends, not infrequently from abroad. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 5:00 am
GOP Leader Mitch McConnell has mused that “In the Senate, most things require 60 votes. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm
This appears to be why Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell reconvened the Senate on May 4, despite Monahan’s warnings. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Sometimes the heavens fall when people blindly follow rules that no longer serve their original purposes; sometimes the heavens fall when people insouciantly break rules that seem inconvenient at the moment. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:13 am
Time assuredly will bring to light the policy strengths and weaknesses of using the individual mandate as part of this national legislation, allowing the peoples’ political representatives, rather than their judges, to have the primary say over its utility. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 11:10 am
Finally. there is Senate minority leader, Mitch McConnell (R-Ky). [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 9:08 pm
In Nixon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 12:51 pm
" Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) made the following comments prior to the Senate votes yesterday. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 5:00 am
(If only Mitch McConnell was their leader!) [read post]
