Search for: "People v Powell"
Results 201 - 220
of 689
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Having weak links in the ranks is a bad idea, and washing people out is necessary. [read post]
12 May 2020, 5:47 pm
Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:30 am
David SchwartzNext week, in Colorado Dept. of State v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
A lot of people seem to be expecting his sudden vindication. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:45 pm
Powell, 392 N.E.2d 598, 599 (I1. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:45 pm
Powell, 392 N.E.2d 598, 599 (I1. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:58 am
You can find a full analysis of this child-specific standard in LaToya Powell’s Juvenile Law Bulletin from 2016. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 8:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:53 pm
Luis Alberto Zambrana La decisión de Ramos v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 11:28 am
” However, Gorsuch explained, it “turns out that the Sixth Amendment’s otherwise simple story took a strange turn” with the Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Apodaca v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 4:14 pm
In Salzberg v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:23 am
Faithless Electors Chiafalo v. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 4:45 am
"The petitioner in the Washington case, Peter Chiafolo, was elected as a presidential elector when Hillary Clinton won that state’s popular vote in 2016 but voted for Colin Powell instead, which led to a $1,000 fine for violating a state law that required him to vote for the presidential and vice-presidential candidates who won the majority of the popular votes. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm
IPSO has published one ruling and resolution statements since our last Round Up: 05337-19 Cameron v Sunday Mail, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), No breach – after investigation 08392-19 Osinyemi v thisislocallondon.co.uk, 14 Confidential sources (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 08220-19 Osinyemi v mylondon.news, 14 Confidential sources (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 08219-19 Osinyemi v yourlocalguardian.co.uk, 14 Confidential sources… [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Bickel’s account – essentially, to emphasize the principles underlying the 14th Amendment and its capacity for growth, rather than how people at the time understood it – is of a piece with one of the ways originalists try to save their approach from generating unacceptable conclusions. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Moreover, applying the Supreme Court’s 1995 opinion in Wyoming v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 10:40 am
" Ray v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:30 am
Justice Powell’s solo concurrence in Bakke v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
”); People v. [read post]