Search for: "People v Showers" Results 201 - 220 of 276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2012, 12:27 am
Those of us who take the Fourth Amendment seriously, with its "right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects" from search and seizure, were dismayed by the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Florence v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:32 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Especially because, and here we get to the point, the Court said in Reed v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 11:20 am by Colin Murray
Many of the cases which outlined the requirements of impartial investigation (like the Jordan case cited above, but including McKerr v United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, Kelly and Others v  United Kingdom, no. 30054/96 and Shanaghan v United Kingdom, no. 37715/97) involved the UK directly (and particularly its security operations in Northern Ireland). [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 5:57 am by Regan Zambri & Long
Nothing can speed up this process, including coffee, cold showers or “walking it off. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 11:08 pm by Tessa Shepperson
[Ben Reeve Lewis is having problems in the shower...] [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,370,713 entitled PULL-OUT SHOWER HEAD FOR KITCHEN and owned by Amfag S.P.A. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,370,713 entitled PULL-OUT SHOWER HEAD FOR KITCHEN and owned by Amfag S.P.A. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:22 am by SHG
To my mind, the case is really a follow-up to Atwater v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 9:10 am by Lyle Denniston
  But where five Justices might draw the line was entirely unpredictable after the hearing on Florence v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
was originally posted on Copyhype FootnotesGrant v. [read post]