Search for: "People v Word"
Results 201 - 220
of 17,785
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2007, 12:45 pm
But you should read it even before I do.This is the "kangaroo court" case, which I previously discussed here and here, in which Judge Saiers seemed to call the California Court of Appeal a kangaroo court, and to which Justice Sims responded with a hearty bench slap.But now the opinion gets amended to -- largely -- take out the slams on Judge Saiers, in large part because the Court of Appeal accepts the word of the San Joaquin District Attorney, who writes a pretty persuasive… [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 12:50 pm
So when Justice Huffman -- or the even-more-cell-phone-provider-challenged-than-I-am law clerk in his chambers -- repeatedly misspells that particular word in this opinion, it definitely caught my eye. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:03 pm
Might I suggest you take a look at Lundeen Coatings, Corp. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 2:35 pm
The post Justice Sotomayor Needs To Re-Read <i>Marbury v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:19 pm
(It's true that the victim testified that she didn't learn about the U-visa program until after her initial testimony at the preliminary hearing, which is indeed a huge problem with the defense, but a jury need not take her word for that fact -- just as they need not necessarily take her word about the underlying domestic violence.)Similarly, the Court of Appeal notes that there was indeed a difference in the testimony that she gave in the preliminary hearing and… [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 4:54 pm
Some people have problems. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:04 pm
The use of the words 'knowingly' and 'falsely' imply otherwise. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 7:32 am
People have some kind of problem with V-necks? [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:08 am
I’m not talking about that “V” word.) [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:35 pm
In People v Lewis (2010 NY Slip Op 02624 [4th Dept 3/26/10])the Fourth Department applied Arnold in the context of the common situation in which prospective jurors state that they would tend to favor the testimony of police witnesses over that of other witnesses:During voir dire, one of the prospective jurors stated that, as a result of her close association with police officers in the course of her work as a loss prevention officer, she would "probably take the word… [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 11:36 am
Perhaps the dissenters focused on the word "stop" and concluded that pulling over the defendant was an acceptable collateral consequence to the legitimate stop, which is reasonable enough. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:58 am
October 31, 2021 I will spill few words here on the U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm
” Justice Antonin Scalia, dissenting in King, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 6:58 am
" See Griswold v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:33 pm
The commission’s power to restrict speech stems from the FCC v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 7:49 am
By Lane V. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 12:08 pm
" At first, I thought that Justice Snauffer meant to say that the victim was handed three fake money orders, with the last word inadvertently omitted. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
(And it's not even shy about it.)The statute requires actual possession to establish guilty, but that's because the Legislature -- and I'm convinced that Justice Humes is correct here -- accidentally left out the word "or" when it amended the statute. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 11:55 am
Many people use the words “charity” and “non-profit organization” interchangeably. [read post]
