Search for: "People v. Abbott"
Results 201 - 220
of 379
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
The Court suggested that most people would not notice the differences between an old Porsche design and the latest model.Can you tell what Porsche model this Kat is sitting on? [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 8:50 am
(Illustration: Lex Villena; Free Speech Coalition)Yesterday, in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
Abbott had already rejected the argument. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 9:08 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 11:06 am
Greg Abbott in May. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm
In CIC Services v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 7:00 am
In People v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We don't know what this stuff means, and unless you're a doctor, chances are that you don't either.But we're pretty sure of one thing - that kind of jargon has very precise medical meaning to the people who do understand what's in these package inserts. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
Shelley v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. and North Carolina Farm Bureau Federation v. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 5:00 am
The other is a collection of people from various nations seeking to join this country. [read post]
19 May 2020, 11:45 am
In Valentine v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:47 am
Long post, lots of stuff to cover in this opinion.MillerCoors, LLC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:31 am
Abbott v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:49 am
Eggleston v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 10:01 pm
Torres v. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 6:34 pm
Desmond v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 12:25 pm
Abbott (redistricting) Solo amicus brief in Fisher v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
Over the weekend the New York Times ran a story by Adam Liptak previewing a US Supreme Court case ("Justices revisit rule requiring lab testimony," Dec. 19) called Briscoe v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 12:30 pm
Abbott, Ginsburg wrote for a unanimous court (with Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito concurring in the judgment and writing separately) that a state engaging in redistricting could create districts with equal numbers of people in them rather than equal numbers of eligible voters. [read post]
