Search for: "People v. Atkins"
Results 201 - 220
of 264
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2019, 7:47 pm
In 2002, three years after Bowles was sentenced, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Atkins v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 8:54 am
Most people feel so strongly about the issue that they can’t unwind their views of the law from their personal beliefs. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 2:51 am
The Grand Chamber Hearings in Von Hannover v Germany and Axel Springer v Germany will be heard on 13 October 2010. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:15 am
Most people likely think the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am
Data privacy and data protection The ICO has called for “urgent improvements” to address the denial of “basic dignity and privacy” for people living with HIV caused by repeated data breaches that disclose their HIV status. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:38 am
The first proposition was reinforced by Kennedy v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 4:13 am
Gradually, most people collect their belongings and, in some cases, their children, and head quietly for home, clearly stunned. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
One company sent more than 415,000 text messages without valid consent, encouraging people to get “free advice”, whilst another made unsolicited calls about pensions. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
Journalism and regulation The PCC has ruled on a new case: A Woman v Clevedon People, clauses 3 (privacy) and 14 (confidential sources). [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 5:04 pm
Mark Thomson is a partner at Atkins Thomson and a member of the Inforrm Committee. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
The company was fined for taking more than 20 billion images of people in the UK found online and on social media to feed its facial recognition database. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am
Most people appreciate the enormous strains on the MoJ and court service to save money and that the premises in Wells St must be expensive. [read post]
8 May 2011, 7:01 pm
In re: People v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
The respondent’s name in the first case nicely captures most people’s instinctive reaction upon discussing AEDPA: Ryan v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Grant of habeas relief vacating petitioner's sentence of death, and ordering that he be resentenced to receive a sentence other than death, is affirmed where the Double Jeopardy Clause bars respondent-warden's claim that, even though petitioner was found to be mentally retarded on direct appeal, Ohio should be permitted to relitigate the finding now that it has taken on new legal significance in light of Atkins v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:48 am
A number of statements in open court can be found on the Atkins Thomson website (see below). [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm
The IPSO complaints committee found that the image used by Mail Online gave the “significantly misleading impression” that the dogs had been provided by the charity Hearing Dogs for Deaf People. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am
Florida and Atkins v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 11:20 am
Some people prefer the creamy part of the Oreo to the chocolate cookie wafers. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In 1918, in Hammer v. [read post]
