Search for: "People v. Bounds" Results 201 - 220 of 3,518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2020, 3:00 pm
  To say that the former stereotype is wrong but the latter is perfectly okay just strikes me as both factually wrong and, to a degree, at least, fairly hypocritical.It might be entirely consistent to say "Well, people guilty of a crime are constitutionally treated differently that people institutionalized for mental illness, and while I don't agree with the former, I'm nonetheless bound to treat them that way. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm by Eric
* Law.com: 25 Most Influential People in IP. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am by Bernard Bell
Presumably, an agency is always bound to ensure that the rules it adopts are consistent with the Fourth Amendment constraints on searches and seizures. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The rule of three was held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911.In applying the Rule of Three, tie scores allow the appointing authority to make its selection from among far more than three eligible candidates. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The rule of three was held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911.In applying the Rule of Three, tie scores allow the appointing authority to make its selection from among far more than three eligible candidates. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
He tries to reassure those people that they `are not in trouble’ and that, even though medical treatment is expensive, their immediate health is more important than the cost. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 6:47 am
Consumers' rationality is bounded. [read post]