Search for: "People v. Bowles" Results 201 - 220 of 416
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2014, 7:00 pm by Bruce Boyden
The 48th annual Super Bowl is tomorrow, which means of course that people are thinking about intellectual property law. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:43 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
The 48th annual Super Bowl is tomorrow, which means of course that people are thinking about intellectual property law. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:43 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
The 48th annual Super Bowl is tomorrow, which means of course that people are thinking about intellectual property law. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 1:31 pm by Joe Patrice
[New York Times] * Remember the Super Bowl Shuffle? [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 12:49 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
, with his gift to landlords all, the case of Spencer v Taylor ably covered by Tessa earlier this week so I wont labour the point here. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
My article, "Transnational Corporations' Outward Expression of Inward Self-Constitution:  The Enforcement of Human Rights by Apple, Inc." has just been published and will appear in the Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20(2):805-879 (2013). [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 11:25 am by Ron Coleman
He cites what he describes as the “seminal case” of Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ken White
Gawker and Sheldon v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 5:48 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Court may take its first look later this year at the case, American Broadcasting Companies v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am by Larry Catá Backer
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013) In his 2004 Storrs Lecture, Gunther Teubner asked:how is constitutional theory to respond to the challenge arising form three current major trends—digitization, privatization and globalization—for the inclusion/exclusion problem? [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 6:01 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
And all participants should have been told that they would effectively have no choice but to have their IRRs “returned” to them: a CTE study involving five retired NFL players, released shortly before the Super Bowl and amidst lots of media coverage about the future of contact sports was bound to go (and has gone) viral. [read post]