Search for: "People v. Buchanan" Results 201 - 220 of 240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2010, 10:38 am by David Bernstein
  Here’s the beginning: Buchanan v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Court of Appeals's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 4:52 am
"People don't need regulatory agencies, because the courts will protect them. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Take, for example, last week’s oral arguments before the Supreme Court in Salazar v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 10:40 am
I have a column that appears today on FindLaw, discussing the Supreme Court's recent decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:28 pm
Thus New Yorkers need not worry that police without warrants or cause could attach such devices to their vehicles in New York and record the vehicles' minute by minute location.In People v Buchanan (6/30/09) the Court again found that the New York Constitution provides protections that have not been clearly found under the United State Constitution. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 8:03 am
"Federalism" in this sense is a national policy of a national people that this national people could change at will through an Article V amendment or by changing the composition of SCOTUS or some other formal or informal constitutional means. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 9:00 pm
Joe Klein, Senator Government V. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 7:44 am
The case is People v. [read post]