Search for: "People v. Courts (1985)" Results 201 - 220 of 1,452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2010, 4:34 pm by J
The policy of the 1985 Act was to protect people against excessive and unreasonable service charge demands. [read post]
1 May 2010, 4:34 pm by J
The policy of the 1985 Act was to protect people against excessive and unreasonable service charge demands. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm by NL
R(Husband) v Solihull; Dixon v Wandsworth. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm by NL
R(Husband) v Solihull; Dixon v Wandsworth. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In light of this week’s leak of Samuel Alito’s draft opinion by which the Supreme Court will soon overrule Roe v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:39 pm by Lawrence Solum
The pure federal common law cause of action expounded by the Supreme Court in 1985’s National Farmers Union v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 6:50 am
Clark (1985) 38 Cal.3d 355 (California Supreme Court)). [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 12:18 pm
The United States responded to this suit by making sure that it kept bouncing between the Oregon district court and the Claims Court, and did so by arguing, first, that Delay's contract was with the United States, and hence had to be heard in the Claims Court, and then, once the suit was in the Claims Court, arguing the exact opposite.These (and other) procedural moves kept the case moving around until 1985, at which point Delay prevailed at trial… [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 4:09 am by Thomas J. Crane
Precedent has value, because businesss, people and the economy rely on a predictable body of law. [read post]