Search for: "People v. Doctor"
Results 201 - 220
of 3,783
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2023, 4:37 am
DorfThe Supreme Court's stay order in Danco Labs v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 6:36 pm
Concerning private pacts, Biskupic does a flashback to NFIB v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 5:53 am
But let’s be clear – the American people must continue to use their vote as their voice, and elect a Congress who will pass a law restoring the protections of Roe v Wade. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Data and privacy practices came up often, including the FTC’s suit against a data broker for allegedly selling data that tracked people at sensitive locations like doctor’s offices and churches. [read post]
Do Law Schools Truly Have to Worry About Students Not Being Able to Handle Real-World Disagreements?
20 Apr 2023, 10:26 am
During an oral argument at the Supreme Court, Justice Neil Gorsuch initiated this bizarre exchange, as reported in Slate:During oral arguments in 303 Creative v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 6:10 am
., v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 6:10 am
., v. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
New emails uncovered in the ongoing Missouri v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 7:25 am
In Estate of McCall v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 7:25 am
In Estate of McCall v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
From Fagan v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 3:03 pm
In Marbury v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
In short, the judge concludes that the plaintiffs have standing to bring this case either on their own behalf as doctors who do not prescribe the drug but are harmed by complications that can “overwhelm the medical system” or lead them to be complicit in “elective chemical abortion” or on behalf of patients who are harmed by medication abortion but unable to vindicate their own interests in litigation. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm
Start w/question of strict liability v. blanket immunity; look at possible regimes; map out core elements of 512, DSA, and 230. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
Cairns v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 6:37 am
For anyone who has had their first visit to a doctor’s office, they likely were greeted with a HIPAA “notice of privacy practices” and asked to sign an acknowledgement of receipt. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
App. 1988); Arroyo v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 4:11 am
“People v Donald ….mmm, hang on, how is that pronounced? [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
The appeals concern the principles to be applied when a court considers an application to vary or discharge a Reporting Restriction Order made in end-of-life proceedings in the High Court preventing the naming of doctors. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Then in City of Austin v. [read post]
