Search for: "People v. Duty"
Results 201 - 220
of 8,343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2019, 4:32 am
It compounds, rather than cures, the vice.Close scrutiny of any proposed social media duty of care from a rule of law perspective can help ensure that we make good law for bad people rather than bad law for good people. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 1:07 pm
Facts of the Case In the case of Easterling v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 1:07 pm
Facts of the Case In the case of Easterling v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 12:09 pm
In DeShaney v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm
I suspect the merger of the two will create unexpected headaches for courts, platforms, and even the people the duty of care was supposed to help: individuals or businesses harmed by illegal content online. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:50 pm
Though both the trial court and the Court of Appeal remind him of that duty after the fact. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 12:04 pm
Uber has a duty to screen its drivers and take steps to protect people who use its app to hail rides. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 4:15 am
I discussed Daniels v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 2:22 pm
People v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
In Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 3:15 pm
Mounsey v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 12:34 pm
A United States, 5th Circuit case styled, Griggs v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 12:34 pm
A United States, 5th Circuit case styled, Griggs v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 3:23 pm
However, in the recent Marchand v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:26 am
A recent court decision may give this argument more strength.Actual Duties Must Be Considered In a recent decision in Richard Sewell v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 6:30 am
Under Section 208 of the 1996 Act, a housing authority has a related duty to house homeless people in its area ‘so far as reasonably practicable’. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 4:53 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:50 pm
The existence of a duty to children was here being developed in such an incremental manner to include vulnerable people who ‘in many ways functioned like children’. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 4:07 am
In addition to its common law nondelegable duty, it had a nondelegable duty imposed by statute and by contract — See, Dixon v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
” As such, it makes sense that Fairhurst would owe these oversight duties regarding matters such as sexual harassment, because that was clearly within his area of responsibility as chief people officer of the company. [read post]
