Search for: "People v. Glass"
Results 201 - 220
of 789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2023, 6:02 am
This case once again shows how qualified immunity works in police misconduct cases.The case is Williams v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 9:43 am
The decision in Webster v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 11:55 am
EFF is asking the Supreme Court to hear arguments in Raynor v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 7:46 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 3:13 pm
The glass made a crunching noise as it slid into the doorframe. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 12:37 pm
Foltz v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:54 pm
See Shatterproof Glass Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 4:10 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:44 am
Hunda Glass Corp. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 4:06 pm
No service was taking place, but some people were inside the cathedral, including journalists and the media invited by the band for publicity. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:10 pm
Flores v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 12:09 am
And her boss testified that she had only one glass of wine prior to the accident. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
In other words, maybe the consumer buys BRAINSTRONG anyway, even if she knows there is a high chance it won't work or even a small chance it might hurt her.My favorite example of the "materiality" limitation on the deceptiveness bar is the GLASS WAX trademark upheld in Gold Seal Co. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:30 am
Fortunately, I have good news and I won't leave you hangin'...People v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:57 am
Today, March 24, is the centennial of the date on which the New York Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Ives v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
MacPherson v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 4:55 pm
In that case, Sutton v. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 3:29 pm
When complete, a marble flooring on the ground level will contain an etched "V/C" emblem. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 8:03 am
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:45 pm
Of course, it all depends on the circumstances, which is why I also agree with the result in People v. [read post]
