Search for: "People v. Grand"
Results 201 - 220
of 2,631
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2017, 2:02 pm
MySpace and Doe v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 2:54 am
The judgment of the Grand Chamber in the case of Pentikäinen v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:19 am
When people lose at trial, the often vow to appeal. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 11:39 am
United States (Assimilative Crimes Act) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2019.htmlJohnson v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 3:43 pm
Fortifying the position that a larceny can't be prosecuted under the circumstances above is found in People v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 6:45 am
Today, we feature Eduardo V. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:42 am
People v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm
The decision of the Grand Chamber of the Court of Human Rights handed down last week in Bărbulescu v Romania ([2017] ECHR 754) is a surprising one that acts as a warning to employers. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 8:35 pm
Count 8, grand theft auto, P.C. 487(d)(1), 25-to-life, plus 10 years, so 35-to-life on that count, stayed, as well, pursuant to 654. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 7:08 am
A few things for people in Dallas, Fort Worth, Grand Prairie, and Arlington to know. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:17 am
”); People v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:24 pm
Last week six people were indicted by a federal grand jury in Reno for allegedly conspiring to possess 500 grams or more of methamphetamine with intent to distribute it. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:19 pm
A summary of the facts The case of Macatė v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:08 pm
In People v Grey (2009 NY Slip Op 03570 [4th Dept 5/1/09]), the Appellate Division, Fourth Department reversed a conviction because the plea was based on a mutual mistake. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:25 pm
Re: United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 6:38 pm
Supreme Court case called Branzburg v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 11:34 am
VanderKooi and Johnson v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Noting the decision of the Court of Appeals in People v Ribowsky, 77 NY2d 284, the Appellate Division observed that "[a] defendant has the right at common law and under the State Constitution to be tried in the county where the crime was committed unless the Legislature has provided otherwise". [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Noting the decision of the Court of Appeals in People v Ribowsky, 77 NY2d 284, the Appellate Division observed that "[a] defendant has the right at common law and under the State Constitution to be tried in the county where the crime was committed unless the Legislature has provided otherwise". [read post]
