Search for: "People v. Grant (1988)" Results 201 - 220 of 552
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2014, 4:37 am
., told Bell Rainey commented to her that he thought she had `”messed” with some nasty people’ and suggested that he otherwise would have, in S.S.'s words, `turn[ed][her] back “straight” from being “gay. [read post]
5 Dec 2024, 5:59 am by Joshua Andresen
Those familiar with the caselaw in this area will know that the Supreme Court held in Holder v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 1:48 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The People move this Court for an Order pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 240.40(2)(b)(v) and the case of Schmerber v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Canada (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development) et al. 2013 FC 6Constitutional Law - Federal jurisdiction (s. 91) – Indians and land reserved for Indians – Indian defined The plaintiffs sought declarations that Métis and Non-status Indians were “Indians” within the meaning of the expression “Indians and lands reserved for Indians” in s. 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867; (b) that the Queen (in right of Canada) owed a fiduciary duty to… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 8:16 am by Russell Knight
When two people are married and buy real estate, there are incredible incentives to hold the property jointly. [read post]