Search for: "People v. Head (1994)" Results 201 - 220 of 317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
Also, inner-city residents have good reason to fear police dogs: Attacks on people by police dogs are disproportionately high when compared with attacks on people in more affluent areas. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
He changed the way people talked about how to read a statute or a constitutional provision. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am by Ronald Collins
Unlike any of my prior writings, the book is intended for a popular audience: people intrigued by how the Supreme Court decides cases as well as people who care deeply about the climate issue. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
Also, inner-city residents have good reason to fear police dogs: Attacks on people by police dogs are disproportionately high when compared with attacks on people in more affluent areas. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by Michael Oykhman
Where two people participate in an indecent act, the presence of a participant in the act does not meet the requirement of “in the presence of one or more persons” (see: R v Follet, 1994 CanLII 10217 (NLCA)). [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
  In addition, other important presidential-power questions are headed towards the Supreme Court, including with respect to the NSA wiretapping program. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 1:15 am
Some people think, in Utah at least, that the firing squad is the most humane because it's just one bullet to the head - it's quick. [read post]