Search for: "People v. Hogan"
Results 201 - 211
of 211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
In Eldridge v British Columbia, the Court found that the failure of hospitals to provide sign-language services for hearing-impaired patients was a violation of section 15. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 7:30 am
People v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 5:38 am
In my view, such a law will not be used by the less privileged people in our society. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
Heller v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:24 pm
" In a March 2023 order denying a motion for a preliminary injunction in Delaware State Sportsmen's Ass'n v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:37 am
Machine or People + Technology? [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
More Adventures In Ethics: Did David Boies Cross Any Ethical Lines In His Work For Harvey Weinstein?
9 Nov 2017, 12:37 pm
At the time (last month), Boies publicly described the scope of his engagement, asserting that he would not be representing Weinstein in any litigation against The Weinstein Company (which he also represented), or assisting celebrity trial lawyer Charles Harder (who represented Hulk Hogan in the invasion of privacy case that broke Gawker) in a $50 million libel case Weinstein was threatening against the New York Times for reporting the first wave of harassment and assault… [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
