Search for: "People v. Hunt" Results 201 - 220 of 998
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2014, 6:54 am
CAT View4485523 ELITE YIELD SOLUTIONS View4480280 TRU-FLEX View4482674 WELLPOINT View4480770 LMAX View4480713 NOTRE DAME FEDERAL CREDIT UNION View4480697 FINDERS KEEPERS VENDOR OUTLET MALL View4480686 LEADMAX View4480672 HETSCO View4480583 THE IUSM SAFETY STORE View4480582 THE SAFETY STORE AT RILEY HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN View4480404 NOVELTYMINTS View4482805 CRIMSON GUARD View4480216 HAIR HUGGERS View4480198 RCMA View4480156 NO MORE EXCUSES View4480109 E&A COMPANIES … [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 9:26 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) In the free speech / dogfighting video case, United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:26 am by Joy Waltemath
While the defendants argued that application of the longer limitations period would be impermissibly retroactive, the court looked to the Supreme Court’s decision in Landgraf v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:55 pm by Joe Mullin
Efforts at reforming this broken system got a big boost in 2014, when the Supreme Court decided the Alice v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 3:47 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Such a claim was successful in People v Mitchell (2010 NY Slip Op 06926 [4th Dept 10/01/10]) in which the Court held thatThe evidence at trial established only that defendant constructively possessed the firearms with respect to the criminal possession of a weapon counts of which he was convicted, and thus the People proved only a single actus reus (see People v Laureano, 87 NY2d 640, 643; People v Hunt, 52 AD3d 1312, lv denied… [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 4:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) So held a North Carolina trial court in Johnston v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm by Anna Salvatore, Benjamin Wittes
Flynn filed a motion to compel certain material under Brady v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 7:29 pm by Frank Pasquale
I imagine all these judges might point to the Scalia non-recusal in Cheney v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 1:09 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil PracticeLocal Civil Rule 6.3 Applied to Deny Reconsideration Of Dismissal of Securities Purchase Fraud Action Hunt v. [read post]