Search for: "People v. Keith" Results 201 - 220 of 501
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2013, 7:16 am
 Keith Mallinson, so often a guest blogger on IP Finance, now makes his debut post as a full team member with "Absurd (F)RAND licensing-rate determinations for SEPs", here. [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:20 am by Matthew Kahn
Nine people were injured and two were arrested. [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:52 am
 Elsewhere there's a post with a link to a lengthy and powerful piece by Keith Mallinson, this being yet another highly persuasive account of the benefits attached to standard-essential patents (SEPs) and an equally convincing attempt to defuse theories that SEPs are harmful. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:30 am by Broc Romanek
California Weighs In From Keith Bishop: The California case of People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:20 pm by INFORRM
   He was not impressed by the PCC I began to see why so many people have given up on the PCC. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 10:55 am by John Floyd
  Keith Lamont Scott   In the Charlotte, the police confronted Keith Lamont Scott, who reportedly was observed rolling a marijuana cigarette. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 2:06 pm by Jeralyn
" It was Justice Cardozo in 1926, then chief judge of the New York Court of Appeals, in People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 2:58 pm
OK, piracy is bad, but how much worse can these people be? [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:49 am by INFORRM
Democratic bodies may represent the people, but they have a distinct identity which may need protecting. [read post]