Search for: "People v. Kerr" Results 201 - 220 of 554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am by CMS
The context is important. 11:29: Lord Kerr again questions the relevance of these submissions to this appeal. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 5:54 pm by Howard Friedman
Orin Kerr and David Kopel both analyze the case at Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:10 pm by CJLF Staff
  The Alco-Sensor V breathalyzer might have shown incorrect readings because of a manufacturer's error that can cause condensation to build in the tube. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:17 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal today gave judgment in the case of ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 439). [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” Whitney Cooney discusses the cert denial in Severson v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 2:18 am by Aimee Denholm
Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson conclude that there was no basis for the presumption and, accordingly, the judge erred in dismissing the appellant’s application relying on that observation. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 3:50 pm
For example, I could explain why I think that the majority view in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 4:24 am by SHG
An 80-year-old man was among those detained, then released, during the operationAs Orin properly notes, this would appear to fly in the face of Ybarra v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 7:34 am by MATHEW PURCHASE
The minority (Lady Hale and Lords Kerr and Clarke) considered that the notice read like a mere request and should have been firmer: paragraphs 103, 122, and 155. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 9:04 pm
See also Dvorak Uncensored and Orin Kerr. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 11:03 am by Alasdair Henderson
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital and Botham (FC) v Ministry of Defence [2011] UKSC 58 – read judgment. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) A few federal court opinions have been making a big public splash recently by taking surprising positions on how the Fourth Amendment applies to location surveillance. [read post]