Search for: "People v. Levine"
Results 201 - 220
of 568
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2008, 1:37 am
This was the point made by the court in Levine v New York City Transit Authority, 70 AD2d 900, affirmed 49 NY2d 747. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
Willis contends that the real issue in Freeman is “whether the price people pay for obtaining a mortgage must be transparent. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 8:40 pm
View the article hereFriends,We are writing today to share a few pieces of information:Santos V. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 1:01 pm
Virginia and Daubert v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 4:10 am
This was the point made by the court in Levine v New York City Transit Authority, 70 AD2d 900, affirmed 49 NY2d 747. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, overruling Roe v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 8:00 am
I'm coming to the defense of my co-conspirator, Bexis.As soon as the Supreme Court decided Wyeth v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:31 am
The petition in Foster v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Palm Beach County Canvassing Board, decided shortly before Bush v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:02 pm
Supreme Court’s 1932 decision in Smiley v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:48 am
In Burwell v. [read post]
31 May 2008, 12:00 pm
I'll live blog below the fold: He associates himself with remarks of Carl Levin. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:39 am
In Riegel v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 11:29 am
In any event, Nina Pirrotti of Garrison, Levin-Epstein, Fitzgerald and Pirrotti, P.C. returns for this installment where an employee-side and employer-side attorney discuss the issues of the day. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
In short, they suggest that sometimes a “perfectly legal” ruse is not being invoked to evade the intent of a law—which is what, for example, people mean when they say that certain abusive tax shelters might be wrong but are technically within the meaning of a poorly written provision. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 52 [week ending on Sunday 14 June] - EU TM reform | Motivate Publishing FZ LLC and another v Hello Ltd | EPO’s Inventor of the Year: poll results | New network for new IP people | Delfi v Estonia | UPC fees | Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc | Canary Wharf Group Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and… [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 8:03 am
This provision builds off of the recent Supreme Court ruling in Wyeth v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 4:29 am
Levine (20) Why stores have surveillance cameras (18) Why Can’t Chuck Start a Business? [read post]
11 May 2021, 2:55 am
The new policy echoes the US Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 2:34 am
" The case, U.S. v. [read post]
